A Group of State Attorneys General Oppose SEC Regulation of Kraken
A group of eight state attorneys general in the United States has expressed their opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken. These attorneys general, representing Montana, Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas, stated that they did not support either side but were against SEC regulation.
“The court should reject categorizing crypto assets as securities absent an investment contract. The SEC’s exercise of this undelegated authority puts state consumers at risk by preempting state statutes better tailored to the specific risks of non-securities products.”
State attorneys statement
The attorneys argue that their main concern is preventing the potential preemption of consumer protection laws and other state laws due to the SEC’s attempt to regulate crypto assets as securities. They believe that state statutes are better suited to address the specific risks associated with non-securities products.
Kraken Challenges SEC Lawsuit
Kraken recently filed a motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit, claiming that it could set a “dangerous precedent” for the regulator’s powers. The company argues that even if the Commission’s statements are theoretically accepted as accurate, they are erroneous as a matter of law.
In November 2023, the SEC accused Kraken of offering unregistered securities in the form of tokens on its platform. The Commission also alleged that Kraken engaged in illegal activities as an exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency. Additionally, there were complaints about inappropriate business practices such as commingling client and corporate funds.
The Howey Test and Crypto Assets
The SEC considers all cryptocurrencies except Bitcoin (BTC) to be securities based on the Howey Test. The Howey Test is a set of criteria used to determine whether an asset has security characteristics and qualifies as an “investment contract.” However, many members of the crypto community argue that this test is not applicable to blockchain assets.
These state attorneys general are concerned about the SEC’s exercise of authority in categorizing crypto assets as securities without an investment contract. They believe that this puts state consumers at risk and undermines the role of state statutes in protecting consumers from the specific risks associated with non-securities products.
Hot Take: State Attorneys General Push Back Against SEC Regulation
A group of state attorneys general has voiced their opposition to the SEC’s case against Kraken and its attempt to regulate crypto assets as securities. They argue that the SEC is exceeding its authority and preempting state statutes that are better tailored to address the specific risks of non-securities products.
This opposition from state attorneys general highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the regulation of cryptocurrencies and blockchain assets. While the SEC sees these assets, excluding Bitcoin, as securities, many in the crypto community disagree and believe that traditional securities laws do not apply to this new technology.
As this legal battle between Kraken and the SEC unfolds, it will likely have far-reaching implications for how cryptocurrencies are regulated in the United States. The outcome could potentially shape future regulations and determine the extent of the SEC’s authority over this rapidly evolving industry.
By
By
By
By
By