• Home
  • Crypto
  • Legal Action Against 3AC for DeFiance Capital Asset Claims Must Proceed
Legal Action Against 3AC for DeFiance Capital Asset Claims Must Proceed

Legal Action Against 3AC for DeFiance Capital Asset Claims Must Proceed

High Court of Singapore Denies Three Arrows Capital’s Request to Dismiss Lawsuit

The High Court of Singapore has rejected a motion by bankrupt firm Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to dismiss a lawsuit filed against it by Arthur Cheong, the founder of Web3 investment firm DeFiance Capital. This ruling is significant in the ongoing legal battle over the ownership and control of assets in the cryptocurrency industry.

Background of the Legal Dispute

In April 2023, Cheong initiated a lawsuit claiming that investors of DeFiance Capital are the rightful owners of assets held in trust by 3AC. He argues that these assets should not be used to settle creditor claims against the now-bankrupt 3AC.

The dispute arises from an agreement where Cheong was supposed to launch an independent fund on the 3AC Group platform, which would be owned and controlled by DeFiance Capital. These funds had separate accounts and wallets under Cheong’s name.

Complexities of Crypto Legal Challenges

The Singapore High Court’s decision to deny 3AC’s motion highlights the complexity of legal issues in the cryptocurrency sector. The court recognized the existence of a trust over the crypto assets in Fireblocks wallets still under 3AC’s control. This recognition contradicts 3AC’s argument that Cheong’s claims are baseless.

The ruling also establishes Singapore’s jurisdiction over the case, emphasizing the importance of wallet key control and legal nexus. This decision sets a precedent for similar cases, especially in jurisdictions like Singapore that are emerging as key centers for crypto activities.

Impact on Industry and Future Outlook

This ongoing legal battle between DeFiance Capital and 3AC has significant implications for asset control and trust relationships in bankruptcy scenarios within the crypto industry. The outcome of this lawsuit could affect hedge funds and investment firms dealing with complex ownership structures.

This case also highlights the need for clear legal guidelines as cryptocurrencies become more integrated into mainstream finance. The Singapore High Court’s decision will likely shape future interpretations and decisions in the rapidly evolving world of crypto investments.

Hot Take: Three Arrows Capital Faces Legal Battle Over Asset Ownership

The High Court of Singapore has denied a motion by bankrupt firm Three Arrows Capital to dismiss a lawsuit filed against it by Arthur Cheong, founder of DeFiance Capital. This ruling is a pivotal moment for the crypto industry, as it addresses asset control and trust relationships in bankruptcy scenarios. It also underscores the complexities of legal challenges in the cryptocurrency sector and establishes Singapore’s jurisdiction over such cases. The outcome of this lawsuit will have far-reaching implications for hedge funds and investment firms operating in the digital asset space. As cryptocurrencies become more integrated into mainstream finance, clear legal guidelines are crucial, and this ruling will likely shape future legal interpretations in the crypto industry.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Legal Action Against 3AC for DeFiance Capital Asset Claims Must Proceed