Lawyers Challenge Late-Night Rule
In the ongoing trial of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), a surprising turn of events occurred when lawyers on one side violated the court’s rule by submitting a five-page letter at 11 p.m. on a Friday. Their intention was to highlight the impact of SBF’s tweets on key witnesses involved in the trial.
One of these witnesses, Marc-Antoine Julliard, a commodities broker and cocoa trader from London, testified about his experience as an investor in FTX. He revealed that his decision to invest in cryptocurrency trading on the exchange was influenced by various factors, including high-profile endorsements, SBF’s presence in influential circles, and the defendant’s social media posts advocating for cryptocurrency use.
Julliard invested around $100,000 in FTX but chose not to withdraw his funds despite early signs of trouble. This decision was influenced by a tweet from SBF reassuring investors that everything was fine. Unfortunately, shortly after that, he lost access to his funds.
Ongoing Scrutiny of Sam Trabucco
Sam Trabucco, the former co-CEO of Alameda linked to FTX, has also attracted attention in this trial. Although he hasn’t been charged for his involvement in the FCPA with FTX and Alameda, new information places him in a November group chat, raising questions about his role leading up to the trial.
The SBF trial continues to unfold with both legal teams putting forth their best efforts to present their cases. The late-night legal maneuvers and unexpected witnesses like Marc-Antoine Julliard contribute to the intrigue surrounding a trial that carries significant implications for the world of finance.
Hot Take: The Intriguing Twist and Ongoing Scrutiny in the SBF Trial
The ongoing trial of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has taken an intriguing turn with lawyers challenging a late-night rule and unexpected witnesses making appearances. The courtroom drama escalated when lawyers on one side disregarded the court’s rule and submitted a letter late at night, emphasizing the impact of SBF’s tweets on key witnesses.
One such witness, Marc-Antoine Julliard, revealed that his decision to invest in FTX was influenced by endorsements, SBF’s influential presence, and social media advocacy for cryptocurrency. Despite early signs of trouble, Julliard chose not to withdraw his funds after seeing a reassuring tweet from SBF, only to lose access to his investments later.
Furthermore, ongoing scrutiny surrounds Sam Trabucco, the former co-CEO of Alameda linked to FTX. While not facing charges directly related to this trial, new evidence implicates him in a group chat, raising questions about his role leading up to these events.
The SBF trial continues to captivate with its legal maneuvers and unexpected revelations. As it unfolds, its implications for the world of finance remain significant.