SEC Drops Appeal in Ripple Case
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has decided not to appeal the recent ruling in the legal battle with Ripple. The case concluded with a civil penalty of $125 million for securities violations related to sales to institutions, a significant reduction from the SEC’s initial demand of $2 billion. The ruling also imposed an injunction to prevent further violations of securities laws.
SEC Responds to Ripple Ruling
After Judge Torres’s decision, Ripple’s executives hailed the ruling as a victory. However, the SEC remained silent until a statement was obtained by FOX Business journalist Eleanor Terrett. The SEC expressed satisfaction with the court’s recognition of Ripple’s conduct as egregious and emphasized the importance of enforcing securities laws regardless of technological advancements.
- The court imposed a $125 million civil penalty on Ripple for securities violations.
- The SEC expressed satisfaction with the court’s acknowledgment of Ripple’s misconduct.
- Ripple celebrated the reduction in fines following the ruling.
No Plans for Appeal
Both Ripple and the SEC seem content with the outcome of the case, with no immediate plans for an appeal. Legal experts speculate that an appeal is unlikely given the parties’ responses to the ruling. Ripple’s CEO and Chief Legal Officer expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision and emphasized the importance of the rule of law in the industry.
- Legal experts believe an appeal is unlikely based on the parties’ responses.
- Ripple’s leadership expressed satisfaction with the ruling and emphasized the industry’s victory.
- XRP was trading at $0.6046 at the time of the ruling.
Hot Take: Ripple-Sec Case Resolution
In conclusion, the SEC’s decision not to appeal the ruling in the Ripple case signifies a potential endpoint to the legal battle. Both parties have expressed satisfaction with the outcome, with Ripple significantly benefitting from the reduced civil penalty. Moving forward, the industry will closely monitor any further developments in the aftermath of this significant ruling.
By
By
By
By