Ripple Vs. SEC: Settlement on the Horizon? Exciting news! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ

Ripple Vs. SEC: Settlement on the Horizon? Exciting news! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ


Rippleโ€™s Proposal to Settle the SEC Dispute

Ripple finds itself embroiled in a legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over alleged violations of securities laws, leading to a proposed settlement that is far from reaching a consensus. Following recent developments in the case, Ripple has put forth its offer to the court, suggesting an alternative remedy to the SECโ€™s stringent demands. The core of the disagreement lies in the proposed fines and penalties each party is advocating for, with Ripple proposing a significantly lower settlement amount compared to the SECโ€™s initial stance.

Rippleโ€™s Plea for a $10 Million Fine

Opposing the SECโ€™s motion for remedies and final judgment entry, Ripple has strongly recommended that a civil penalty not exceeding $10 million be imposed by the court. This stark contrast in settlement figures underscores the wide gap between the SECโ€™s stance and Rippleโ€™s proposed terms. The Commission had originally sought a substantial pecuniary fine of nearly $2 billion for Rippleโ€™s alleged violations through its institutional XRP sales.

  • Rippleโ€™s offer: Civil penalty not more than $10 million
  • SECโ€™s proposal: Fine of $1,950,768,364

Rippleโ€™s Justification for a Lower Penalty

Presenting a compelling argument to substantiate its proposal, Rippleโ€™s legal team contends that the statutory maximum penaltiesโ€™ first tier should be applied in this scenario. They maintain that since the SEC has not accused Ripple of fraud, deceit, or manipulation, the lower penalty range is more apt. Moreover, Ripple asserts that limiting the penalty assessment to the revenues generated from pre-complaint institutional sales is the fairer approach, justifying their stance for a penalty not exceeding $10 million.

Discrepancies in SECโ€™s Financial Analysis

Ripple has claimed that the SEC committed an error when calculating the companyโ€™s earnings for determining the fine amount. According to Rippleโ€™s legal representatives, the Commission overlooked crucial aspects of Rippleโ€™s financials, particularly in terms of expenses. Alleging that the SEC solely based its calculation on revenue without considering other expense categories, Ripple has raised concerns regarding the accuracy and thoroughness of the SECโ€™s financial assessment.

Questionable Calculation Methods

Moreover, Rippleโ€™s lawyers have criticized the SECโ€™s reliance on Andrea Foxโ€™s declaration, an accountant at the agency, arguing that her input was inadequately disclosed and lacked proper vetting during the discovery phase. They further emphasize the need to disregard Foxโ€™s submission as an untimely expert witness report, highlighting potential flaws in the SECโ€™s financial analysis.

Rippleโ€™s Resistance Against SECโ€™s Proposed Injunction

As part of the final judgment proposal, the SEC has called for a permanent injunction to restrain Ripple from engaging in unregistered institutional sales, a move vehemently opposed by Ripple. Citing potential repercussions on their operational activities, particularly in the realm of ODL transactions, Ripple has urged the court to reject the injunction request. The lack of concrete evidence supporting the need for an injunction, coupled with Rippleโ€™s proactive measures to prevent future violations, forms the crux of their argument against the SECโ€™s injunction plea.

Demonstrating Compliance and Good Faith

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

Rippleโ€™s legal team underscores the companyโ€™s commitment to compliance by highlighting the significant changes implemented in their sales and contractual practices to mitigate any future violations. Accompanied by a declaration from Rippleโ€™s President, Monica Long, detailing the corrective measures adopted by the company, Ripple seeks to showcase its proactive stance in adhering to regulatory standards and avoiding any potential breaches in the future.

Author – Contributor at | Website

Newt Bettec emerges as an intellectual voyager at the intersection of crypto analysis, meticulous research, and editorial mastery. Within the digital labyrinth of cryptocurrencies, Newt’s intellect traverses intricate corridors, resonating with seekers of diverse inclinations. His talent for unraveling complex threads of crypto intricacies seamlessly blends with his editorial finesse, transmuting intricacy into an engaging tapestry of understanding.