The Dispute Over SEC’s Crypto-Asset Interpretation
Ripple’s CTO expresses concerns over SEC’s interpretation of crypto-asset security, fueling the tension between the cryptocurrency industry and regulatory bodies.
Breaking Down the SEC Battle
Schwartz argues that the SEC’s definition of crypto-assets is more aligned with tokenized stocks, not reflecting the nature of assets transferred via distributed ledger technologies.
The Asset Debate
Schwartz illustrates that the term “asset” encompasses more than just the physical item in transactions, challenging SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s broad classification of crypto products as securities as part of Ripple’s broader challenge against the SEC’s regulatory stance.
Legal Battle: Judge Torres and the Howey Test
Judge Torres’ ruling stated that XRP’s programmatic sales do not qualify as securities under the Howey Test, contradicting Gensler’s maintaining of the SEC’s interpretation. Pro-XR lawyer Bill Morgan criticizes the SEC for using vague terms to push its regulatory agenda.
Crypto Rules in Flux
The Ripple-SEC showdown illustrates the struggle of fitting new tech into old rules, and the crypto crowd eagerly waits to see how it might shake up the whole industry as this drama unfolds.
Hot Take: Regulatory Disputes Impact the Crypto Industry
This ongoing dispute between Ripple and the SEC highlights the challenges in regulating cryptocurrencies and how legal battles can have a significant impact on the entire crypto industry, causing uncertainty and apprehension among stakeholders.
By
By
By
By
By