• Home
  • Crypto
  • Ripple’s Current Legal Twist: Deaton Analyzes Ongoing Judicial Rollercoaster
Ripple's Current Legal Twist: Deaton Analyzes Ongoing Judicial Rollercoaster

Ripple’s Current Legal Twist: Deaton Analyzes Ongoing Judicial Rollercoaster

In a New Twist, Judge Denies SEC’s Plea for Interlocutory Appeal

In the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres has denied the SEC’s request for an interlocutory appeal. This decision is seen as a setback for the SEC, which wanted an early appeal despite the upcoming trial involving Ripple’s top executives.

Insights from John Deaton

John Deaton, who closely follows the case, shared his thoughts in a recent interview with Thinking Crypto. He pointed out that interlocutory appeals are typically pursued without a pending trial, making the SEC’s request unusual.

Predictions Prove Wrong

Contrary to earlier predictions, Judge Torres rejected the SEC’s appeal request. Deaton acknowledged that this was a clear message to the SEC, as it failed to provide a substantial reason for the appeal, especially with a trial date already set.

Uncovering the SEC’s Strategic Error

Deaton explained that the SEC’s appeal attempt was based on Judge Raykoff’s decision in the TerraForm case, which was believed to contradict Judge Torres’s ruling in the Ripple case. However, this approach backfired and allowed Judge Torres to clarify her stance.

Community Interpretations and Clarifications

Earlier interpretations of Judge Torres’s ruling by the crypto community varied. Some saw it as an indication that XRP, when traded on an exchange, wasn’t considered a security, potentially impacting other tokens. However, Judge Torres clarified that her ruling did not categorically exclude a token from being deemed a security if sold on an exchange.

Setting the Stage for Trial

The denial of the SEC’s interlocutory appeal request highlights the regulator’s recent losses and sets the stage for the trial involving Ripple’s executives, scheduled for April 23, 2024. This decision is seen as a crucial step towards resolving uncertainties surrounding the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies.

Deaton’s Take on the Development

“It was just another SmackDown of Gary Gensler and the SEC,”

Deaton expressed his views on the ruling, emphasizing the SEC’s inconsistent approach to crypto cases and how this decision affirms Judge Torres’s earlier rulings.

Hot Take: The SEC Faces Another Setback in Ripple Case

In a new development in the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres has denied the SEC’s plea for an interlocutory appeal. This decision is seen as a setback for the SEC, which sought an early appeal before the trial involving Ripple’s top executives. John Deaton, closely following the case, believes this ruling sends a clear message to the SEC and highlights their strategic error. The denial of the appeal paves the way for the trial, scheduled for April 23, 2024, and signifies an important step in clarifying the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Ripple's Current Legal Twist: Deaton Analyzes Ongoing Judicial Rollercoaster