The Ripple SEC Case: A Stark Warning and Troubling Newsflash
Ripple Labs, the company behind XRP, recently received a favorable ruling declaring the token as a non-security. However, this news has been overshadowed by a decision made by SDNY District Judge Jed Rakoff, allowing the SEC to proceed with its lawsuit against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon.
Key Points:
- Judge Rakoff rejected the distinction made in the Ripple case between institutional sales and sales to the public.
- He emphasized that the source of purchase does not alter the reasonable expectation of profits from the coins.
- The “major questions doctrine,” which restricts regulatory agencies from overstepping their role, was also rejected by Judge Rakoff.
- Judge Rakoff’s prestigious stance on securities law adds weight to his decision.
- These rulings have implications for how cryptocurrencies are understood, regulated, and integrated into the global financial system.
Hot Take:
The SEC’s ability to proceed with the case against Terraform Labs and the rejection of key distinctions made in the Ripple case raise concerns for the wider crypto community. It is clear that the legal landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies is still evolving, and these decisions will shape the future of the industry. The implications of these rulings go beyond Ripple’s fate and have far-reaching consequences for the regulation and integration of cryptocurrencies into the financial system.
By
By
By
By
By