Ripple Vs. SEC: A Legal Update
Stuart Alderoty, the Chief Legal Officer of Ripple Inc., shared a significant update on Twitter regarding the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The recent development in the appeal of the SEC vs. Govil case could have a significant impact on the lawsuit.
Stuart Alderoty’s Tweet 🐦
In his tweet, Alderoty highlighted the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision not to reconsider their ruling in the SEC vs. Govil case. He specifically emphasized the key takeaway from the ruling, which stated that the SEC cannot demand disgorgement from sellers if buyers did not suffer any financial losses.
According to Alderoty, this ruling challenges the SEC’s demand for a $2 billion fine from Ripple for the unregistered sale of XRP tokens, where no financial harm was incurred by buyers.
Bill Morgan’s Analysis 💡
Legal expert Bill Morgan responded to Alderoty’s tweet by offering further insights into the SEC’s stance and its implications for Ripple. Morgan highlighted the SEC’s argument in the Govil case, focusing on the agency’s pursuit of disgorgement based on alleged financial harm to investors.
According to Morgan, the SEC claims that Ripple should have disclosed discounts offered to certain institutional investors, which could have impacted other investors’ negotiations. This suggests that even if investors did not suffer losses, they could have potentially received better terms.
The denial of the SEC’s appeal in the Govil case is a positive development for Ripple’s legal defense. This ruling could allow Ripple to challenge the SEC’s claims regarding investor losses and the justification for disgorgement. Both Alderoty’s tweet and Morgan’s analysis provide valuable insights into the changing legal landscape and its implications for Ripple.
By
By
By
By