Ripple’s Response to SEC’s Demands for Financial Statements and Discovery in XRP Lawsuit

Ripple's Response to SEC's Demands for Financial Statements and Discovery in XRP Lawsuit


Ripple Responds to SEC’s Motion to Compel

Ripple has filed a response to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) motion to compel. In their letter to Judge Sarah Netburn, Ripple’s lawyers argue that the SEC’s requests are untimely. They claim that the Commission had ample opportunity to request these documents during fact discovery and their failure to do so means they lack good cause now.

SEC’s Requests Are Irrelevant

Ripple’s lawyers also state that the SEC has failed to justify each of its requests on the merits. They believe that these requests are irrelevant to the case and have no bearing on the court’s remedies determination. The crypto firm alleges foul play on the part of the Commission, suggesting that they are trying to get a summary ruling without a full proceeding.

Avoiding Delay and Additional Litigation

Ripple urges the court not to go down the slippery slope paved by the SEC, as it would lead to a second full-blown litigation for any actions taken by Ripple after the initial lawsuit. This could create significant delays for all parties involved. The crypto firm’s lawyers advise against granting summary judgment, as it would deprive them of certain legal protections.

SEC Seeks Ripple’s Financial Statements

The SEC is seeking Ripple’s audited financial statements for 2022 and 2023 as part of its motion to compel. They also want all contracts for the sale of XRP entered into by Ripple after the initial lawsuit commenced. The SEC is looking for evidence that suggests Ripple violated securities laws after their legal battle began.

Hot Take: Ripple Fights Back Against SEC’s Request

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

Ripple is pushing back against the SEC’s motion to compel, arguing that the requests are untimely and irrelevant to the case. The crypto firm accuses the Commission of foul play and urges the court to avoid additional litigation and delays. Ripple’s response highlights the ongoing legal battle between the two parties and the importance of proper justification for requests made by regulatory bodies.

Author – Contributor at | Website

Bitro Conwell stands as an intellectual architect, weaving together the roles of crypto analyst, meticulous researcher, and editorial virtuoso with finesse. Amidst the digital intricacies of cryptocurrencies, Bitro’s insights resonate harmoniously with seekers of all stripes, showcasing a profound understanding. His ability to untangle the most complex threads within the crypto landscape seamlessly pairs his their editorial finesse, transforming intricacy into an artful tapestry of comprehension.