SBF’s Lawyers Allege Unfair Treatment
Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) lawyers claim that United States Prosecutors are engaging in unethical behavior and creating obstacles for SBF to receive a fair trial. They argue that the government cannot dump millions of pages of evidence on the defense just weeks before the trial, hindering SBF’s chance for a fair defense.
The Lawyers’ Arguments
- The prosecutors’ recent disclosure of an additional 4 million pages of discovery impedes SBF’s ability to prepare a legal defense.
- The government has no intention of providing the documents to SBF for review.
- SBF has been working long hours to review the voluminous discovery and create detailed analyses to share with his attorneys.
Internet Access Is Unreliable
SBF’s lawyers strongly state that the jail’s poor internet access is making it difficult for him to build a solid defense. They argue that limited battery life, lack of power outlets, and weak internet connection are causing significant issues. SBF is unable to view, edit, or share work product with his attorneys, and he cannot access his extensive preparation materials in his Google Docs folder.
Judge Kaplan’s Decision
Judge Kaplan allowed SBF to meet with his lawyers during visitation hours but rejected the request for his temporary release from prison to prepare for his trial.
Hot Take
The unfair treatment and obstacles faced by SBF, as alleged by his lawyers, raise concerns about the integrity of the trial process. It is crucial to ensure that defendants have sufficient time and resources to prepare a defense and that their rights are protected.
By
By
By
By
By