SEC’s Implicit View on Ethereum
The debate about the classification of Ethereum under U.S. securities laws has been ongoing. The SEC has taken legal action against several crypto projects for issuing tokens that are considered securities, but Ethereum and its native asset, ETH, have not been targeted by the regulatory agency.
Bloomberg’s ETF analyst, James Seyffart, suggests that the SEC’s lack of action on Ethereum may imply that it sees ETH as a commodity, not a security. He points to the approval of Ethereum futures ETFs as evidence supporting this perspective.
Seyffart predicts that if the SEC changes its stance on Ethereum’s status, approved Ethereum futures contracts could be delisted. This move could create conflict between the SEC and the CFTC, which oversees futures contracts.
SEC Chair Gary Gensler has implied that both Bitcoin and Ethereum are commodities, not securities. Seyffart anticipates Gensler will publicly classify Bitcoin as a commodity in 2024 but not address Ethereum, solidifying its non-security status.
Seyffart believes that the SEC may not prioritize classifying Ethereum as a security at this time. He suggests that Gensler could designate other crypto assets as securities instead, which would have significant regulatory implications.
Gensler’s Position and Industry Reactions
Despite Gensler’s position advocating for most crypto projects issuing tokens to be considered securities, the crypto industry is actively challenging this narrative. Ongoing lawsuits involving Ripple and Coinbase highlight the industry’s vigorous defense of its position on crypto assets’ classification as securities or commodities.
Hot Take
The debate around Ethereum’s classification as a security continues, with the SEC’s actions — or lack thereof — indicating a potential shift in how it views Ethereum. This has significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry and the regulatory landscape, as well as potential conflicts within the regulatory agencies.
By
By
By
By
By