Judge Finds SEC Guilty of Misconduct in Crypto Fraud Case
A federal judge in Utah has issued a sanction against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its misconduct in a cryptocurrency fraud case. The SEC was accused of making false and misleading statements in its pursuit of a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Digital Licensing Inc., also known as “DEBT Box.”
The Allegations Against DEBT Box
Last July, the SEC took legal action against DEBT Box, alleging that the company and its founders were involved in a fraudulent scheme. The scheme revolved around selling fake “node licenses” to investors, promising them crypto assets through mining. It was claimed that DEBT Box raised approximately $50 million and an undisclosed amount of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).
The SEC’s Misconduct
To support its case, the SEC obtained a TRO and asset freeze by arguing that DEBT Box was using investor funds for luxury purchases and offshore accounts. However, DEBT Box challenged these allegations, claiming that the SEC misrepresented facts.
- The restraining order was dissolved in October after a hearing.
- In November, the judge overseeing the case asked the SEC for an explanation regarding the alleged misrepresentations.
- In December, the SEC admitted that one of its lawyers had made an inaccurate statement during the initial hearing.
- The lawyer claimed that 33 bank accounts associated with DEBT Box were closed in the 48 hours leading up to the court date.
- However, it was later revealed that only 24 bank accounts were closed, and none of them were closed during that month.
- The SEC did acknowledge that the balances of certain bank accounts owned by the defendants were substantially reduced in July, but they were not closed.
- The SEC also admitted to presenting interpretations and inferences as facts multiple times.
Judge’s Ruling and Sanctions
Judge Robert Shelby described the SEC’s conduct as a “gross abuse of power” that undermined the integrity of the proceedings and the judicial process. As a result, he imposed sanctions on the SEC, ordering them to pay attorneys’ fees and costs for all expenses related to the TRO and the appointment of the Receiver. This includes covering all costs and fees incurred by the Receiver.
Hot Take: SEC Held Accountable for Misconduct
The recent ruling against the SEC highlights the importance of accountability in regulatory enforcement actions. In this case, the SEC was found guilty of making false and misleading statements, which ultimately compromised the integrity of the legal proceedings. It serves as a reminder that regulators must act ethically and responsibly to maintain public trust in their actions.
By
By
By
By
By