• Home
  • Binance
  • SEC uses Judge Failla ruling to impact Binance & CZ lawsuit! 🚨🔐
SEC uses Judge Failla ruling to impact Binance & CZ lawsuit! 🚨🔐

SEC uses Judge Failla ruling to impact Binance & CZ lawsuit! 🚨🔐

Understanding the SEC’s Victories in the Coinbase and Binance Lawsuits

Get insights into the recent rulings by Judge Failla in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cases against Coinbase and Binance. Discover how these decisions impact the classification of various crypto assets and the regulation of offerings, sales, and services in the cryptocurrency space.

SEC’s Filing Regarding Coinbase Ruling in the Binance Lawsuit

• The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission submitted a notice of supplemental authority to inform the court about Judge Failla’s recent ruling in the SEC v. Coinbase case.
– This filing serves as the second significant supplemental authority in the lawsuit against Binance, Binance.US, and Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.
• Following a previous court decision on supplemental authority, the SEC opted to inform the court of the Coinbase ruling instead of contesting arguments related to Binance’s lawsuit dismissal.

• The SEC charged Binance for the unregistered offers and sales of cryptocurrencies like BNB, BUSD, and products like “Simple Earn” and “BNB Vault.”
– Additionally, BAM Trading faced charges for the unregistered offer and sale of Binance.US’ staking-as-a-service program.
• The court’s ruling in the Coinbase case deemed the staking program as unregistered securities, aligning with the SEC’s claims against Binance and its entities.

• Judge Failla also supported the SEC’s position that Coinbase acted as an unregistered intermediary of securities, denying most of Coinbase’s motions except for the Wallet service.
• In both the Coinbase and Binance lawsuits, the SEC identified 19 cryptocurrencies as securities, shedding light on the ongoing process to determine the classification of various crypto assets.

Interpretation of Secondary Market Sales as Securities

• The U.S. SEC is pushing to categorize nearly all cryptocurrencies as investment contracts, considering them unregistered securities in the eyes of the law. However, legal experts and industry players have differing opinions on this matter.
– Judge Failla’s rejection of Judge Torres’ reasoning in the Ripple case sets a precedent that counterarguments can be made regarding the classification of cryptocurrencies as investment contracts.

• As the Binance vs. SEC lawsuit progresses towards resolution, the defendants have fulfilled several discovery and deposition requirements set by the SEC. The upcoming joint status report and potential briefings in April indicate the final stages of the legal dispute between the parties.

Hot Take: Analyzing the Future Implications of SEC’s Decisions in Crypto Regulation

Explore the potential outcomes and implications of the SEC’s recent victories in the Coinbase and Binance lawsuits on the cryptocurrency industry. Stay informed about the evolving regulatory landscape and its impact on market participants, offerings, and services in the digital asset space.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

SEC uses Judge Failla ruling to impact Binance & CZ lawsuit! 🚨🔐