• Home
  • Coinbase
  • SEC vs. Coinbase: Legal Battle Regarding Classification of Cryptoassets
SEC vs. Coinbase: Legal Battle Regarding Classification of Cryptoassets

SEC vs. Coinbase: Legal Battle Regarding Classification of Cryptoassets

The SEC Opposes Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a legal memorandum opposing Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The SEC argues that crypto assets traded on Coinbase meet the criteria of an “investment contract” according to the Howey test. They state that investors expect profits primarily from the efforts of others and that each crypto asset issuer on Coinbase’s platform has invited investors to expect an increase in value.

Coinbase’s Claim Rejected by the SEC

The SEC refutes Coinbase’s claim that transactions on its platform never involve investment contracts as defined by common law. They emphasize that the existence or absence of contractual undertakings is just one factor considered in determining whether an investment contract exists. The SEC also rejects Coinbase’s attempt to shift blame onto them, stating that Coinbase has been aware since 2016 of the potential classification of crypto assets as securities under the Howey test.

Coinbase Counters SEC Claims

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, responded to the SEC’s claims on social media. Grewal criticized the SEC for making broad legal claims without sufficient legal citations and argued that the assets listed on Coinbase are not securities and therefore not under the SEC’s jurisdiction. He mentioned recent court decisions that have clarified this distinction. Grewal also highlighted the “Stand With Crypto” initiative in Washington, D.C., where founders from over 40 crypto companies advocate for consumer-friendly legislation.

Hot Take: SEC and Coinbase Continue Legal Battle Over Crypto Assets

The legal battle between the SEC and Coinbase continues as the SEC opposes Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The SEC argues that crypto assets traded on Coinbase meet the criteria of an investment contract, while Coinbase maintains that these assets are not securities and are outside the SEC’s jurisdiction. This case raises important questions about the regulatory framework for crypto assets and the role of the SEC in overseeing their trading. As the crypto community awaits the court’s decision, it remains to be seen how this legal battle will shape the future of crypto regulation in the United States.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

SEC vs. Coinbase: Legal Battle Regarding Classification of Cryptoassets