Silvergate Agrees to $63M Settlement for AML Violations 🤑

Silvergate Capital Corp. Settles Charges with U.S. and California Regulators

Silvergate Capital Corp., the parent company of the now-closed crypto-friendly Silvergate Bank, has reached a $63 million settlement with U.S. and California regulators. The settlement resolves allegations of internal management lapses and misleading disclosures about its anti-money laundering program.

SEC Lawsuit Against Silvergate

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Silvergate Capital Corporation and its former executives.
The SEC accused the bank of providing false information to the public and shareholders regarding its anti-money laundering program.
Silvergate allegedly failed to detect nearly $9 billion in suspicious transfers by FTX, a significant customer.

Regulatory Penalties

The Federal Reserve and California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) also levied fines on Silvergate.
The penalties include $43 million from the Fed and $20 million from the California regulator.
The SEC imposed a $50 million fine on Silvergate, which can potentially be reduced by payments to the banking regulators.

Settlement Agreements

Silvergate, former CEO Alan Lane, and former COO Kathleen Fraher agreed to settlements without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations.
They will pay fines, and Lane and Fraher accepted a five-year ban on serving as officers or directors of public companies.
Former CFO Antonio Martino has contested the allegations through legal representation.

Allegations of Misconduct

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Lane and Fraher were aware of deficiencies in the bank’s compliance program before November 2022.
Despite warnings from regulators, Silvergate did not acknowledge any risks in its reporting.
The bank’s rapid growth in the digital assets sector was followed by its closure in March 2023 during a challenging period for the crypto industry.

Impact on the Crypto Sector

Silvergate’s closure, along with other banks like Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, caused disruptions in the U.S. banking sector.
This situation left digital asset companies struggling to find banking partners as the industry faced challenges.
A spokesperson for Silvergate mentioned that the settlements are part of the bank’s winding down process.

Hot Take: Conclusion

In conclusion, Silvergate Capital Corp.’s settlement with regulators highlights the importance of transparency and compliance in the financial industry. While the bank’s rapid growth in the digital assets sector was notable, its closure serves as a cautionary tale for companies operating in the crypto space. As the industry continues to evolve, regulatory oversight and adherence to best practices are crucial for long-term sustainability and trust among stakeholders.

Sources: