TLDR
- Vitalik Buterin cautions against aligning with politicians solely based on their ‘pro-crypto’ stance.
- He emphasizes the importance of broader technological freedoms and values that drove the crypto movement.
- Buterin warns that focusing only on ‘pro-crypto’ positions may undermine the fundamental cypherpunk ideals.
- He advises against supporting politicians who claim to be ‘pro-crypto’ without a commitment to internationalism and broader freedoms.
- Buterin’s blog post has sparked mixed reactions from industry figures, with some questioning his political insights.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community with a recent blog post that warns against aligning with political figures solely based on their ‘pro-crypto’ stance.
Titled “Against choosing your political allegiances based on who is ‘pro-crypto’,” the post highlights the significance of considering broader technological freedoms and the core values that initially inspired the crypto movement.
Buterin argues that focusing solely on ‘pro-crypto’ positions could erode the foundational values that attracted individuals to the crypto realm. He points out that the roots of crypto trace back to the cypherpunk movement, which advocated for open technology to safeguard individual liberties.
According to Buterin, this philosophy goes beyond cryptocurrencies and blockchains, encompassing aspects like encrypted communication, digital identity, and privacy.
The Ethereum creator underscores the importance of internationalism, a cause that resonates with many within the cypherpunk community.
He warns against backing politicians who claim to be ‘pro-crypto’ but do not exhibit dedication to internationalism and wider freedoms, cautioning that such support could be counterproductive.
Sharing personal experiences from events like EthCC, where visa issues hindered some participants, Buterin emphasizes that immigration laws are critical for the global crypto community.
Buterin also cautions against the prevalence of the ‘pro-crypto’ approach among authoritarian regimes.
He cites Russia’s use of crypto to circumvent external regulations while imposing stringent controls domestically as an example.
Buterin warns that power-seeking politicians or those willing to align with authoritarian leaders might adopt similar strategies, ultimately undermining the freedoms that crypto intends to safeguard.
The blog post has garnered diverse responses from prominent figures in the crypto industry. Some, like Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at Variant Fund, acknowledged the valid points made by Buterin but pointed out potential misinterpretations of the post as endorsing a specific political party.
You make some solid points here. Too many people will read the headline as “vote Biden!” and miss the rest.
That said, overall, much of this seems too clever by half. Good crypto policy requires electing pro-crypto candidates, period. Political reality beats idealism every time.
— Jake Chervinsky (@jchervinsky) July 17, 2024
However, not all reactions were favorable. Ryan Selkis, CEO of Messari, criticized Buterin for being “politically naive” and labeled him an idealist rather than a realist.
Selkis, a vocal advocate, suggested that Buterin’s post could be viewed as implicit backing for what he perceives as an “anti-tech president.”
It’s also worth noting that Vitalik’s political commentary is meaningless to me, and should be to you as well if your primary focus is American politics.
He is a Canadian and Russian.
I humbly suggest that he fix those governments first, and stay out of American politics.
— Ryan Selkis (d/acc) 🇺🇸 (@twobitidiot) July 17, 2024
This debate emerges at a time when cryptocurrency is gaining traction as a significant subject in U.S. political discourse.
Former President Trump, previously skeptical of crypto, has embraced the technology and is set to speak at the upcoming Bitcoin conference in Nashville. This shift has led some in the crypto community to view the Republican party more favorably in terms of crypto policies.
Buterin’s post stresses the importance of delving deeper than surface-level ‘pro-crypto’ stances and evaluating a politician’s long-term perspectives and broader stance on technological freedoms. He recommends analyzing a politician’s historical views and anticipating how their positions may evolve.
Hot Take 📈
The crypto community remains divided over Vitalik Buterin’s caution against aligning with politicians purely based on their ‘pro-crypto’ stance. This debate underscores the complexities of intertwining technology, politics, and the core values that drive the crypto movement. As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, it becomes imperative for individuals to critically evaluate political endorsements, considering not only immediate crypto policies but also the broader implications for technological freedoms and internationalism.
By
By
By
By
By