Shifts in Semiconductor ETFs Performance: A Deep Dive 🧐
The semiconductor sector is experiencing distinct performance variances between two prominent exchange-traded funds (ETFs), both tracking U.S. semiconductor stocks. Notably, these changes come as the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) achieves substantial gains while the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) trails far behind. Understanding these differences enables better insights into investment strategies this year.
Significant Performance Discrepancy 📉
In 2024, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF has surged approximately 42%, whereas the iShares Semiconductor ETF showcases only a 15% increase. This striking gap of over 26 percentage points represents the most considerable divide seen in over ten years. Such performance metrics hold critical implications as the VanEck ETF continues to outpace the broader S&P 500 and the technology-oriented Nasdaq Composite. Conversely, the iShares fund seems positioned for underwhelming returns relative to these key indices, despite its stakes in a sector known for rapid advancements and its association with artificial intelligence.
Emergence of Divergence 🔍
The apparent performance divergence traces back to last year, with VanEck outperforming iShares by nearly 7 percentage points in 2023. Historically, these funds maintained relatively close performance levels, alternating leads within a few percentage points. Presently, this significant widening gap raises questions among retail investors regarding distinct operational strategies of these popular funds targeting the same industry.
Evaluating AI Exposure and Weighting ⚖️
The reasons behind this bifurcation can be scrutinized through the lens of AI investment strategies, particularly the treatment of the AI powerhouse Nvidia. Roxanna Islam, who leads sector and industry research at a leading financial data firm, points out a distinct difference in how each ETF allocates weight to Nvidia.
- Shifting Weights:
- Both ETFs are among the largest in the semiconductor space.
- They track similar indexes and employ market cap-weighting techniques.
- Each fund has a management fee of 0.35%.
- Variances in Holdings:
- VanEck SMH targets the 25 biggest U.S. semiconductor stocks, while iShares SOXX focuses on 30.
- VanEck gives more substantial weightings to its foremost holdings compared to iShares, influencing overall performance, especially regarding Nvidia.
Nvidia’s Impact on ETFs Performance 📈
Nvidia’s stock performance this year has been remarkable, increasing by over 175%. This impressive rise positions it as a key player in both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500. Funds with higher exposure to Nvidia enjoy greater benefits from this upswing. In the case of VanEck’s SMH, Nvidia constitutes nearly 20% of its portfolio, whereas it represents less than 8% of the iShares fund. As Islam explained, “It does come down to one being more top-heavy than the other.”
Within the iShares SOXX ETF, Nvidia does not even rank as the most significant holding, falling behind Broadcom despite its standout performance this year.
Is This a Temporary Trend? 🤔
When considering the 2024 performance fluctuations, Islam suggests both ETFs offer unique advantages. The VanEck SMH ETF boasts greater size and liquidity, while the iShares SOXX ETF features a more diverse range of holdings, often with a smaller average market cap, providing broader exposure to the semiconductor space. Additionally, SOXX has enjoyed a significant first-mover advantage, having been established around a decade prior.
Despite the dramatic contrast of performance this year, both funds rank favorably in the top 5% of technology funds based on their trailing ten-year returns. Anticipating future trends, Islam does not foresee such an extensive gap persisting into 2025, cautioning against abandoning the iShares fund solely based on this year’s results.
Risk Considerations and Reflection 🔄
While the VanEck SMH ETF has thrived alongside Nvidia’s bullish trend, Islam emphasizes that a concentrated portfolio can introduce significant risks. She highlights that Nvidia’s recent performance may be beginning to stabilize, suggesting caution for future investments. “Some individuals question: Why not just invest in Nvidia directly instead of the ETF focusing heavily on a single stock?” Islam articulated. “Nvidia has fared well this year, but the outlook might shift next year.”
By
By
By
By
By