Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Challenge SEC Fraud Charges
Terraform Labs and its former CEO, Do Hyeong Kwon (Do Kwon), have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in response to the fraud charges brought against them by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC claims that Kwon and his company were involved in a multi-billion dollar crypto-asset securities fraud, including unregistered transactions and interconnected crypto-assets. However, Terraform Labs and Kwon deny these allegations, arguing that the SEC lacks concrete evidence and has misapplied the Howey test.
Disputing the SEC’s Allegations
The defendants challenge the SEC’s legal standing and interpretation of the facts. They argue that there is no evidence of offering or selling “investment contracts,” which are necessary for the SEC’s case. The lawyers state that after an extensive investigation, it is clear that the crypto assets in question, such as UST, LUNA, WLUNA, and MIR, do not meet the criteria of investment contracts. They criticize the SEC’s application of the Howey test, asserting that all three elements must be met for an asset to be considered a security.
Exemption from Registration Requirements
Terraform Labs and Kwon also contend that even if the assets were deemed securities, they would be exempt from registration requirements. They highlight the complexities of applying traditional securities laws to the rapidly evolving world of crypto assets. The motion emphasizes the lack of clarity in existing laws and accuses the SEC of misapplying these laws. Attorney Douglas Henkin from Dentons US LLP concludes by requesting summary judgment in its entirety with prejudice.
Hot Take: The Battle Continues Between Terraform Labs and the SEC
In their latest legal move, Terraform Labs and Do Kwon have submitted a Motion for Summary Judgment to dismiss the fraud charges brought against them by the SEC. The defendants strongly deny any wrongdoing and challenge the SEC’s accusations, arguing that there is no concrete evidence to support the claims. They also question the SEC’s interpretation of the facts and its application of securities laws. This case highlights the complexities of regulating crypto assets within existing legal frameworks and raises important questions about the clarity and adaptability of securities laws in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry.
By
By
By
By