The Distribution of 40 Billion Points by Crypto Projects: Is There an End in Sight?

The Distribution of 40 Billion Points by Crypto Projects: Is There an End in Sight?


If thereโ€™s one thing thatโ€™s united members of the crypto community in recent months, itโ€™s the emergence of points.

If you’ve been following the crypto space, you’ve probably noticed a growing trend of projects implementing points programs. However, these points have received a lot of backlash from the community.

Why do points get a bad rep?

The dislike for points stems from their lack of value and potential scammy nature. Unlike tokens received through airdrops, points hold no real-world value and cannot be traded. This takes away the excitement and sense of achievement that users get from receiving tokens. Points also function more like IOUs, with no guarantee of ever turning into actual tokens.

Investors and VCs weigh in

Investors and venture capitalists have differing opinions on points. While retail investors criticize them, VCs see their flexibility as an advantage. Points allow projects to test assumptions without the complexities associated with launching tokens. Additionally, offering points can help fine-tune incentives and avoid regulatory risks.

FriendTech: Points but no airdrop

The case of FriendTech highlights why users have become disillusioned with points. The project implemented a points system to reward user engagement but failed to deliver on an anticipated token airdrop. This resulted in a decline in trading volume and user interest.

The future of points

While some VCs believe that point incentive systems will continue to attract customers, others see them as a temporary fad. The long-term viability of points remains uncertain.

Hot Take: Are points worth it?

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

In conclusion, while some projects may find value in implementing points programs for short-term incentives, it’s crucial to consider the community’s perception and potential drawbacks. Points lack the excitement and value that tokens offer, and their long-term sustainability is questionable. Ultimately, it’s important to strike a balance between attracting customers and providing lasting incentives in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

The Distribution of 40 Billion Points by Crypto Projects: Is There an End in Sight?
Author – Contributor at Lolacoin.org | Website

Theon Barrett shines as a distinguished crypto analyst, accomplished researcher, and skilled editor, making significant strides in the field of cryptocurrency. With an astute analytical approach, Theon brings clarity to intricate crypto landscapes, offering insights that resonate with a broad audience. His research prowess goes hand in hand with his editorial finesse, allowing him to distill complex information into accessible formats. Theon’s work serves as a guiding light for both experienced enthusiasts and newcomers, providing well-researched perspectives that empower informed decision-making in the ever-evolving realm of cryptocurrencies.