For the third time in Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial, another former member of his inner circle, Nishad Singh, admitted guilt to several crimes and testified that Bankman-Fried was involved as well. Singh, who was an early employee of Alameda Research and later became FTX’s Head of Engineering, emotionally testified about how he fell under Bankman-Fried’s corrupting influence. Despite being willing to tell Bankman-Fried ‘no,’ Singh claimed it made little difference. Singh criticized Bankman-Fried’s excessive spending and questioned his relationship with Michael Kives. He also revealed that Bankman-Fried directed political donations through Singh’s account for advantageous optics.
Singh mentioned that FTX considered collaborating with Telegram for additional liquidity and building an in-app payment system. However, Singh expressed concerns about receiving illiquid tokens and the $120 million payment to Telegram. Despite objections from Singh and Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried insisted on proceeding with the deal. Singh also testified that Bankman-Fried requested backdating transactions to improve FTX’s financials. However, Singh refused to comply when he realized it was an attempt to deceive a U.S. regulator.
In September 2022, Singh confronted Bankman-Fried about Alameda’s financial situation and the $13 billion borrowed funds they couldn’t repay. This revelation left Singh feeling betrayed and horrified. Despite considering leaving FTX every day, he stayed out of fear of a preventable collapse. When the disaster eventually happened, Singh admitted to having suicidal thoughts but decided against falsifying transactions or helping draft a misleading tweet from Bankman-Fried’s account.
Hot Take: Testimony Reveals Corrupt Practices by Sam Bankman-Fried
The recent testimony by Nishad Singh in Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial sheds light on the extent of corruption within FTX and Alameda Research. Singh’s emotional account of his fall from idealism to criminality under Bankman-Fried’s influence highlights the tragic narrative presented by the government. It also raises questions about Bankman-Fried’s excessive spending and questionable relationships with influential figures.
Furthermore, Singh’s testimony reveals attempts to deceive regulators and manipulate financial records. The willingness of Bankman-Fried to engage in these practices raises concerns about the integrity of FTX and its operations. Singh’s decision to speak out against these actions, even at the risk of his own well-being, demonstrates the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions.
As the trial continues and more evidence is presented, it is crucial to examine the implications for the broader cryptocurrency industry. This case serves as a reminder that transparency, ethics, and regulatory compliance are essential in building trust within the crypto community. It also emphasizes the need for strong oversight and enforcement to prevent similar abuses in the future.
By
By
By
By
By
By