The Ripple-XRP Legal Battle Makes Its Way to the Terra Luna Trial in Korea
The ongoing legal battle between Ripple and XRP has taken a new turn as it becomes a focal point in the Terra Luna trial in Korea. Prosecutors in the trial are strategically incorporating the Ripple-XRP legal discourse to strengthen their case, particularly in relation to the security status of the tokens in question.
Main Breakdowns:
- The Terra Luna trial in Korea revolves around the classification of tokens as securities.
- Prosecutors have leveraged Ripple’s recent legal victory in the United States to bolster their arguments.
- A translated version of a U.S. court’s judgment concerning Ripple has been acquired by the Seoul prosecutor’s office.
- The judgment states that although XRP itself wasn’t classified as a security, its characterization changed when sold to institutional investors.
- Deputy Chief Prosecutor Dan Sung emphasizes that the U.S. court’s discernment of XRP’s status has wider implications for understanding what constitutes securities.
Implications of the U.S. Court Ruling in the Terra Luna Trial
Ripple’s recent partial victory against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had significant implications for the ongoing Terra Luna trial. The ruling by Judge Analisa Torres rejecting the classification of XRP as an “investment contract” has now become central to the Terra Luna trial, highlighting its importance.
Deputy Chief Prosecutor Dan Sung suggests that Luna Coin’s unique commitment to profit sharing sets it apart from Ripple, potentially leading to its reclassification as a security.
Hot Take:
The incorporation of Ripple’s legal battle into the Terra Luna trial in Korea showcases the far-reaching impact of Ripple’s recent victory against the SEC. This trial highlights the complexities surrounding the classification of tokens as securities in different jurisdictions and the need for clear regulatory frameworks in the crypto space.
By
By
By