SEC v Ripple Ruling ‘Troubling on Multiple Fronts’
Former SEC official John Reed Stark analyzed the SEC v. Ripple ruling concerning XRP and shared his concerns on Linkedin. He believes the decision is problematic and likely to be appealed. Here are the key breakdowns:
- The court categorized Ripple’s XRP offering into three categories: institutional sales, programmatic sales, and other sales.
- Institutional investors receive full SEC protection and remedies, while retail investors receive no SEC protection.
- The SEC is expected to appeal the ruling to the 2nd Circuit, and Stark predicts the district court’s rulings related to programmatic and other sales will be overturned.
- If the SEC loses the appeal, it may lead to the emergence of programmatic buyer tokens (PBTs) on unregulated crypto-trading platforms.
- The Ripple decision implies that the same token can be considered a security in some cases but not others, and the less information and disclosure for retail investors, the less protection they receive.
Hot Take:
The SEC v. Ripple ruling raises concerns about the inconsistency in token classification and the unequal protection for retail investors. The potential appeal and the emergence of unregulated programmatic buyer tokens could impact the crypto market. The decision seems to prioritize institutional investors while leaving retail investors vulnerable. It remains to be seen how this ruling will shape the future of crypto regulations.
By
By
By
By
By
By