The Ongoing Debate on the Use of Bitcoin
The debate surrounding the use of Bitcoin has resurfaced once again. Luke Dashjr, a Bitcoin developer and co-founder of Ocean mining pool, criticized inscriptions like Ordinals and BRC-20 tokens, calling them a spam attack that exploits a vulnerability in the Bitcoin blockchain. However, Bob Bodily, co-founder and CEO of Ordinals marketplace Bioniq, disagrees with Dashjr’s stance and believes that miners are unlikely to fight against these inscriptions due to the revenue they generate.
Bodily argues that limiting Bitcoin’s data storage capabilities would not only reduce miner revenue but also undermine the benefits brought by upgrades like Taproot and Segwit. He believes that even if limitations were enforced, there would still be demand for meta-protocol transactions like Ordinals on Bitcoin.
Filtering Inscriptions and CoinJoin Transactions
Luke Dashjr’s Ocean mining pool has implemented a “fix” to filter inscriptions transactions using the Bitcoin Knots implementation. This upgrade aims to address the vulnerability exploited by spammers on the Bitcoin network. However, this implementation is not widely adopted by nodes running the most popular software implementation, Bitcoin Core.
Casa CTO Jameson Lopp believes that economic rationality will prevail among miners who prioritize maximizing profits. He argues that classifying inscriptions as a vulnerability or spam is subjective and depends on individual beliefs about appropriate use cases for the Bitcoin protocol.
It is worth noting that Ocean mining pool appears to be censoring Samourai’s Whirlpool CoinJoin transactions, which involves pooling inputs from multiple users into a single transaction for privacy purposes. Dashjr claims it is due to a bug in Whirlpool’s software, while Samourai denies this.
An Ongoing Debate on How Bitcoin Should Be Used
The rise of Ordinals on Bitcoin has sparked a debate about the existence of inscriptions representing things like NFTs and BRC-20 tokens. Some argue that these unconventional uses are unintended consequences of Bitcoin’s upgrades and should be removed, while others believe they are an integral part of the protocol as long as users comply with its rules.
Transactions on the Bitcoin network have surged this year, coinciding with increased activity related to inscriptions. This has led to congestion and higher fees for users. Despite the challenges, there is still a demand for meta-protocol transactions like Ordinals on Bitcoin.
Hot Take: The Debate Continues
The debate over how Bitcoin should be used continues to divide the crypto community. On one side, Luke Dashjr argues that inscriptions and certain tokens are spam attacks exploiting vulnerabilities in the blockchain. On the other side, Bob Bodily believes that miners prioritize revenue and won’t actively fight against these inscriptions. Both sides make valid points, but it remains to be seen how this debate will unfold and whether any changes will be made to accommodate or restrict unconventional uses of Bitcoin.
By
By
By
By
By
By