Former Ethereum Advisor Reveals Potential Discord and Legal Issues
In a series of tweets, Steven Nerayoff, a former advisor to Ethereum, has made public several facts that could have significant implications for the Ethereum network. These tweets suggest internal disagreements and possible legal discrepancies involving Ethereum co-founders Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Lubin.
One tweet by Bill Morgan alludes to the idea that Ethereum may have received two “free passes” in regulatory clearances. The first clearance could be related to Ethereum’s ICO in 2014, while the second could be connected to the Hinman speech in June 2018, which clarified Ethereum’s position on securities regulations.
These revelations raise two important questions: What exactly is in Joseph Lubin’s “piece of paper” that he has mentioned? Could it be one of the two regulatory clearances that Ethereum supposedly received?
What is Lubin’s ‘Piece of Paper’?
Joseph Lubin, a co-founder of Ethereum and the founder of ConsenSys, has referred to a “piece of paper” that they had before launching Ethereum’s ICO in 2014. The nature of this document is unclear. Some speculate that it could be an opinion letter from a law firm or even a “no-action” letter from the SEC.
Lubin has emphasized that this document provided legal assurance for the ICO. Its significance cannot be overstated. If it is indeed a “no-action” letter from the SEC, it would mean that Ethereum had obtained regulatory approval before the ICO and potentially avoids being classified as a security.
Legal Camouflage or Regulatory Approval?
The nature of this “piece of paper” could range from an opinion letter from a law firm, such as Pryor Cashman LLP, to an official clearance from the SEC or another regulatory body. While an opinion letter would provide some protection, it wouldn’t guarantee immunity against regulatory actions.
If the document turns out to be an official clearance, it could have far-reaching implications. It could significantly impact the perception of Ethereum’s legality and establish a precedent for future blockchain projects.
The “piece of paper” is not just a footnote in Ethereum’s history. It has the potential to reshape narratives and influence regulatory perspectives on the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities.
Hot Take: The Significance of Lubin’s “Piece of Paper”
The revelation of Joseph Lubin’s “piece of paper” raises intriguing questions about Ethereum’s regulatory standing and legal assurances. If this document is indeed a “no-action” letter from the SEC or an official clearance, it could have profound implications for Ethereum’s classification as a security. It has the potential to reshape the narrative surrounding Ethereum’s legality and set a precedent for other blockchain projects. The significance of this “piece of paper” cannot be overstated, as it has the power to influence regulatory perspectives on cryptocurrencies and redefine what constitutes security in the crypto world.
By
By
By
By
