The Special Privileges
Gary Wang, former Chief Technology Officer of the bankrupt exchange FTX, has provided details about the special privileges granted to sister company Alameda Research. These privileges allowed Alameda to trade faster and maintain a negative balance on the exchange. Wang revealed that he and the Chief Engineer, Nishad Singh, introduced a unique code that enabled Alameda to have a negative balance after FTX’s launch. Additionally, Alameda could withdraw funds even if their accounts showed zero balance, thanks to an extensive line of credit. Regular customers, in contrast, had credit lines limited to $1 million.
These exclusive privileges were granted to Alameda because of its role as FTX’s market maker. Liquidating Alameda’s large position could have caused damage to the platform.
SBF Lied About FTX Financial Health
Wang also revealed that Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the founder of FTX, lied in a tweet claiming that FTX was “fine” despite knowing about the firm’s $8 billion hole. Wang stated that SBF’s claims about the financial health of FTX were far from reality. He emphasized that FTX did not have enough assets for customer withdrawals and that Alameda was allowed to withdraw customer funds.
According to prosecutors, SBF used these withdrawals for property purchases, political donations, marketing gimmicks, and other expenses. Wang’s testimony is part of the ongoing trial against SBF in a New York Court. While Wang has pleaded guilty to charges related to the exchange collapse, SBF maintains his innocence and faces multiple fraud charges.
Hot Take: FTX’s Special Treatment of Alameda Raises Questions About Fairness
The revelation of the special privileges granted to Alameda by FTX raises concerns about fairness and equal treatment on the exchange. Allowing a sister company to trade faster, maintain a negative balance, and withdraw funds with zero balance while regular customers had limited credit lines seems highly preferential. These privileges could have given Alameda an unfair advantage in trading and potentially impacted the financial health of FTX.
The allegations of SBF lying about FTX’s financial health further erode trust in the exchange and its leadership. If proven true, it raises questions about transparency and integrity within the cryptocurrency industry. It remains to be seen how these revelations will impact the ongoing trial and the reputation of FTX as a leading crypto exchange.