SEC Chair Shrugs Off Crucial Bitcoin ETF Inquiry
The ongoing hearing featuring the United States Congress’s House Financial Services Committee and Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is not going well for the SEC. Congressman Rep Warren Davidson, who supports Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrencies, asked Gensler if he respects the authority of the Judiciary in matters related to the Bitcoin ETF. This question was prompted by Gensler’s previous comment on a court ruling that criticized the SEC for denying spot Bitcoin ETF applications arbitrarily. Gensler’s response to Davidson’s question was dismissive, indicating that he may not respect the court’s verdict.
The lawmaker also inquired about the commission’s approach to revising its stance on a Bitcoin ETF. Gensler mentioned that the applications for spot Bitcoin ETFs are currently under active consideration.
SEC Chair Fails to Allay Favoritism Fears on Bitcoin ETF Applicants
When asked if the SEC will prioritize certain big-spot Bitcoin ETF applicants over others who have been working with the commission for years, Gensler did not provide a detailed answer and simply shrugged off the question. Concerns have been raised about potential favoritism in the approval process, especially now that major players like BlackRock and Fidelity are actively pursuing Bitcoin ETFs. Lawmakers have been urging the SEC to expedite its approval timeline to maintain U.S. dominance in financial innovation.
Despite these concerns, the SEC has decided to postpone its decision on Bitcoin ETF applications from GlobalX, Ark Invest, and 21Shares, indicating that approval is unlikely in the near future.
Hot Take: SEC Chair’s Lack of Transparency Raises Concerns
Gensler’s dismissive response to questions regarding the authority of the Judiciary and potential favoritism in the Bitcoin ETF approval process has raised concerns about the SEC’s transparency and fairness. The market is eagerly awaiting clarity on the SEC’s stance and timeline for approving Bitcoin ETFs. The involvement of major institutional players further emphasizes the need for a clear regulatory framework. Without a definitive path forward, the United States risks falling behind in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market.
By
By
By
By
By