Why Cardano Founder Believes Bitcoin Can Never Attain the Level of ADA or Ethereum

Why Cardano Founder Believes Bitcoin Can Never Attain the Level of ADA or Ethereum


Can Bitcoin L2’s Never Be Like Cardano?

In a recent exchange of ideas on X (formerly Twitter), a debate unfolded between Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, and Muneeb Ali, co-founder of Stacks, a project focused on enabling smart contracts on Bitcoin. The discussion centered around the potential and limitations of Bitcoin’s layer-2 (L2) innovations, particularly in comparison to networks like Cardano and Ethereum.

Muneeb Ali’s Perspective

Muneeb Ali began by sharing insights from the Satoshi Round Table in Dubai, highlighting the bustling activity around Bitcoin L2 projects. He mentioned that the Bitcoin L2 session at the event was the largest he had seen, with five Bitcoin L2 projects present. Ali emphasized the potential of these projects to unleash BTC as an asset through programmable L2s and predicted a significant increase in Bitcoin dominance if they succeed.

Charles Hoskinson’s Counterargument

In response to Ali’s enthusiasm, Charles Hoskinson presented a contrasting viewpoint, emphasizing Bitcoin’s architectural limitations. He argued that Bitcoin cannot change enough to support the necessary requirements for a vibrant L2 environment. Hoskinson highlighted the continuous upgrades of Ethereum and Cardano to enhance developers’ options for deploying efficient and secure L2s.

Debate Over BitVM

Ali mentioned BitVM, a technology that allows new functionalities at the L1 to be deployed while handling further upgrades at the L2 level without requiring changes to Bitcoin itself. Hoskinson remained skeptical due to practical limitations and security concerns associated with Bitcoin L2s, which often rely on centralized or federated models contradicting BTC’s decentralized ethos.

The Last Word

Hoskinson expressed concerns about long finality windows and optimization trade-offs in systems involving fraud proofs, equating the new developments to “new paint on old ideas.” It remains to be seen whether other voices from the Bitcoin L2 community will contradict Hoskinson’s claims.

Hot Take: The Future of Bitcoin L2s

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

The debate between Charles Hoskinson and Muneeb Ali raises important questions about the potential and limitations of Bitcoin’s layer-2 innovations. While Ali highlights the rapid growth and potential of Bitcoin L2 projects, Hoskinson emphasizes the architectural limitations and practical challenges associated with implementing L2 solutions on Bitcoin. The future of Bitcoin L2s remains uncertain, with differing perspectives on their feasibility and effectiveness. It will be interesting to see how this debate unfolds and whether new developments can address the concerns raised by Hoskinson.

Author – Contributor at | Website

Bitro Conwell stands as an intellectual architect, weaving together the roles of crypto analyst, meticulous researcher, and editorial virtuoso with finesse. Amidst the digital intricacies of cryptocurrencies, Bitro’s insights resonate harmoniously with seekers of all stripes, showcasing a profound understanding. His ability to untangle the most complex threads within the crypto landscape seamlessly pairs his their editorial finesse, transforming intricacy into an artful tapestry of comprehension.