Pro-XRP Legal Expert Questions SEC’s Credibility
Pro-XRP legal expert John Deaton has criticized the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in response to its recent statement regarding a false Spot Bitcoin ETF approval post by Cointelegraph. Deaton argues that the SEC cannot be considered the best source of information about itself due to confirmation bias and self-serving statements that undermine its credibility.
Deaton Challenges the SEC’s Objectivity
In a post on his X platform, Deaton disagreed with the SEC’s claim that it is the best source of information about itself. He suggested that the Commission’s decision-making may lack objectivity, particularly in relation to the ETH Gate controversy and potential conflicts of interest. He emphasized the importance of independent judges in shaping public perception of the SEC.
SEC’s Arbitrary Nature Towards Spot Bitcoin ETFs
Deaton also referenced Grayscale’s victory against the SEC, where a court concluded that the Commission had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying Grayscale’s application to convert its GBTC fund into a Spot Bitcoin ETF. He highlighted the court’s criticism of the SEC and its denial as “utter nonsense.” The court found no reason for the SEC to approve futures ETFs while denying Spot Bitcoin ETFs when they face similar market manipulation risks.
Listening to Judges Amidst SEC’s Clampdown
Deaton pointed out that a federal judge had previously criticized the SEC’s lawyers and their lack of faithful allegiance to the law. As a result, he believes it is important to listen to judges when considering issues related to the SEC. These comments reflect a growing reliance on courts for guidance in navigating regulatory challenges within the crypto industry amidst ongoing SEC enforcement actions.
Hot Take: Seeking Objective Information Amidst Regulatory Uncertainty
John Deaton’s critique of the SEC’s credibility raises important questions about the objectivity of regulatory agencies and the need for independent oversight. As the crypto industry faces increasing scrutiny, it becomes crucial to seek reliable and unbiased sources of information to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape. The involvement of courts in shaping public perception of the SEC highlights the importance of legal expertise in interpreting and challenging regulatory decisions. Moving forward, stakeholders in the crypto space should continue to advocate for transparency, fairness, and accountability from regulatory authorities.
By
By
By
By