Sorting by

×
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Adam Back suggests increasing block size to accommodate inscriptions and emphasizes Bitcoin’s unstoppable JPEG capability

Adam Back suggests increasing block size to accommodate inscriptions and emphasizes Bitcoin’s unstoppable JPEG capability

Image

Adam Back Proposes Increasing Block Size to Support InscriptionsCopy

Adam Back, the CEO of Blockstream, has acknowledged that it is futile to try and stop inscriptions, which are media embedded directly on the Bitcoin blockchain. He believes that taking action against inscriptions will only lead users to find alternative, potentially worse, ways of embedding media. Instead, Back has proposed adding a new blob of data to Bitcoin blocks specifically dedicated to inscription purposes.

Back’s Criticism of the Ordinals ProtocolCopy

Back has been critical of the Ordinals protocol since its launch, referring to it as inefficient and stupid. He has prompted developers to explore other solutions like IPFS to achieve similar objectives.

Subscribe to our Social Media for Exclusive Crypto News and Insights 24/7!

Dealing with Congestion Using a “Segwit Annex”Copy

Adam Back suggests increasing block size to accommodate inscriptions and emphasizes Bitcoin's unstoppable JPEG capability

Ordinal inscriptions and stamps, which involve media embedding on Bitcoin, have resulted in high transaction fees, reaching over $40. Back suggests that addressing this congestion issue can be done by allocating space within each block specifically for hosting inscriptions. He proposes the creation of a “segwit annex” that miners would pay to access, offering a discount compared to taproot inscriptions.

Support from the CommunityCopy

Adam Back suggests increasing block size to accommodate inscriptions and emphasizes Bitcoin's unstoppable JPEG capability

Back’s proposal has received support from many users in the community who have noted similarities to Ethereum’s Proto-Danksharding, which adds data blobs with a limited lifespan to the Ethereum blockchain, accompanied by their own fee market.

Hot Take: Block Size Increase Offers Solution to InscriptionsCopy

Adam Back’s proposal to increase the block size in order to accommodate inscriptions on Bitcoin provides a potential solution to the issue of embedded media. Acknowledging the futility of trying to stop such inscriptions, Back suggests a dedicated space within each block for inscription purposes. This approach not only addresses congestion concerns but also offers a discount for miners. Support from the community indicates that this proposal aligns with similar solutions in other blockchain networks.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Source

Adam Back suggests increasing block size to accommodate inscriptions and emphasizes Bitcoin's unstoppable JPEG capability