Empower Oversight Sues SEC for Refusing FOIA Compliance ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿš€

Empower Oversight Sues SEC for Refusing FOIA Compliance ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿš€


Empower Oversight Takes Legal Action Against SEC

Empower Oversight, an organization focused on promoting transparency and accountability within government agencies, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The lawsuit alleges that the SEC has failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by not producing documents related to the ETHGate scandal. This scandal involved former SEC Director William Hinman and former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton declaring that Ethereum (ETH) is not a security.

Details of the Lawsuit

Empower Oversightโ€™s lawsuit claims that the SEC has refused to respond to their FOIA request and provide the requested documents. Additionally, new information about Hinman and Claytonโ€™s involvement with firms after leaving the SEC has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Empower Oversight argues that these actions by the SEC warrant further investigation and legal action.

Violation of Federal Law

According to Empower Oversight, the SECโ€™s failure to comply with FOIA requirements is a violation of federal law. The law mandates that government agencies must respond to FOIA requests within 20 days. By delaying their response, the SEC is obstructing Empower Oversightโ€™s oversight into potential conflicts of interest involving SEC officials and cryptocurrency issues.

Tristan Leavitt, President of Empower Oversight, emphasizes that the public has a right to access all documents related to ethical violations by public officials and the SECโ€™s failure to hold them accountable. The organization believes that transparency is crucial in ensuring fair regulation of cryptocurrencies.

Ripple Lawsuit and Ethereum Classification

Empower Oversight also raises concerns about the SECโ€™s handling of crypto-related issues, particularly in relation to the ongoing Ripple vs SEC lawsuit. The organization submitted FOIA requests seeking transparency and answers from the SEC regarding the classification of Ethereum as a non-security and potential conflicts of interest in relation to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Despite claiming that further regulation is unnecessary, the SEC has not provided clear guidance on which cryptocurrencies are considered securities and which are not. Empower Oversight believes that this lack of clarity hinders the development and growth of the crypto industry.

The Howey Test and Inter-Agency Conflict

The SEC has historically used the Howey Test, which assesses whether an investment involves a common enterprise with an expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others, to determine the securities status of cryptocurrencies. However, there have been concerns raised about potential conflicts between different government agencies.

CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam testified before the House about inter-agency conflict concerns. This was due to plans by Prometheum, a broker-dealer registered with the SEC, to custody Ethereum. The SECโ€™s declaration that Ethereum is a security has implications for this custody arrangement and raises questions about regulatory consistency.

SEC Faces Setbacks

A recent decision by Judge Robert J. Shelby in the Debt Box case has dealt a blow to the SEC. The judge sanctioned the SEC for abusing its power and lying in federal court. The ruling favored Debt Box and ordered the SEC to pay all legal costs for the defendants.

Executives from Ripple and Coinbase, Stuart Alderoty and Paul Grewal respectively, have criticized both the SEC and its Chairman Gary Gensler. They argue that this ruling sets a precedent that could impact other ongoing crypto-related lawsuits.

Hot Take: Demand for Accountability

The lawsuit filed by Empower Oversight against the SEC highlights the importance of accountability and transparency within government agencies, especially when it comes to regulating cryptocurrencies. The failure of the SEC to respond to FOIA requests and provide necessary documents raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and ethical violations.

It is crucial for the public to have access to all relevant information regarding the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities and the actions of government officials. This will ensure fair regulation and foster trust in the crypto industry.

The recent setbacks faced by the SEC in court rulings further underscore the need for accountability. The crypto industry is evolving rapidly, and it is essential for regulatory bodies like the SEC to keep pace with these changes while upholding ethical standards.

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

As a crypto enthusiast, you have a vested interest in promoting transparency and accountability within government agencies. By supporting organizations like Empower Oversight and staying informed about legal developments, you can contribute to a more fair and trustworthy crypto ecosystem.

Author – Contributor at | Website

Gapster Innes emerges as a visionary adeptly blending the roles of crypto analyst, dedicated researcher, and editorial maestro into an intricate tapestry of insight. Amidst the dynamic world of digital currencies, Gapster’s insights resonate like finely tuned harmonies, captivating curious minds from various corners. His talent for unraveling intricate threads of crypto intricacies melds seamlessly with his editorial finesse, transforming complexity into an eloquent symphony of comprehension.