Is Decentralized Finance a Viable Alternative to Conventional Payment Systems?

Is Decentralized Finance a Viable Alternative to Conventional Payment Systems?


Can Decentralized Finance Replace Traditional Payments?

There’s a lot of talk about DeFi (decentralized finance) these days. If one were to believe all the hype, it would seem that DeFi is a foregone conclusion – it’s not a matter of if complete decentralization will happen, but rather a matter of when. Admittedly, it does appear that things are heading in that direction. The potential, the market need and the technology are all there.

While some infer that we could make the switch right now, that’s beyond optimistic. It’s true that decentralization is dependent on blockchain technology, and you’d be hard-pressed to find people who will argue that blockchain doesn’t work. Even naysayers, when pushed, will concede that the technology itself is solid and has the potential to disrupt finance as we know it.

Consumer buy-in and trust

Our current centralized systems have been in place for a long time. They’re accepted because they’re familiar – and for the most part, they work very well. People are resistant to change, particularly when they don’t see a clear benefit.

Even when shown the upsides, many will distrust a new way of doing things, taking refuge behind an ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ mentality. One of the chief arguments for DeFi is that it removes the middleman. But that doesn’t take into account that some people would rather pay a third party to perform a service.

We generally accept that financial professionals know more than we do about their specialty and will do a better job. More importantly, when professionals provide a service, they also take on the accompanying risk. Consumers will be even more hesitant to accept a new system if it also means losing protection and accepting liability.

Banks and financial institution acceptance

Financial organizations are understandably dragging their feet over a move to DeFi. Our existing banking model is deeply rooted in the most basic tenet of capitalism – being paid to perform a service. In this case, arranging financial transactions on behalf of the customer.

As we’ve seen, decentralization empowers users to do the work without a go-between, and consumers may not go for that. For the financial industry, however, DeFi could be devastatingly disruptive. Services that are currently integral to their business could become obsolete, meaning banks stand to lose the biggest revenue source they have.

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

DeFi could also potentially expose

Author – Contributor at | Website

Daisy Hodley emerges as a luminary blending the roles of crypto analyst, devoted researcher, and editorial virtuoso into a harmonious symphony. In the realm of digital currencies, Daisy’s insights resonate with an exquisite resonance across a diverse spectrum of minds. Her adeptness in decoding intricate threads of crypto complexities seamlessly intertwines with her editorial finesse, translating intricacy into a captivating melody of understanding.