The Controversy Surrounding Arkham Intelligence’s Privacy Practices
Arkham Intelligence, a crypto data firm, faced backlash from the crypto community for its new service designed to expose the owners of digital wallets. This move drew criticism from privacy advocates who prioritize anonymity. However, the controversy deepened when it was revealed that Arkham had been inadvertently leaking its own customers’ private information, shedding light on the company’s approach to user privacy.
Key Points:
- Arkham Intelligence launched a service to unveil the identities of crypto wallet owners, which faced criticism from privacy-focused crypto advocates.
- The company’s own privacy practices were called into question when it was discovered that it used an easily decodable method to hide customers’ email addresses.
- The issue stemmed from Arkham’s weblink referral program, where user email addresses were disguised as meaningless characters but were actually encoded in Base64, making them easy to decode.
- Arkham did not respond to requests for comment regarding the privacy concerns.
- Arkham’s plans for a bounty-focused marketplace for anonymous crypto wallet identification also drew criticism.
The revelation about Arkham’s privacy practices gained attention after a Twitter user, m4gicpotato, shared the issue and criticized the company. M4gicpotato, a privacy advocate and crypto contributor, questioned the endorsement of Arkham by Binance, especially following the delisting of privacy coins in the EU. The use of Base64 encoding for user emails further exacerbated the concerns.
It remains unclear how many users were affected by the privacy vulnerability. However, it has been discovered that the setup exposing email addresses has been in place since at least December. Arkham’s Twitter account had shared a referral code that included the Base64 version of the CEO’s email address.
Hot Take
Arkham Intelligence’s privacy practices have created a significant controversy within the crypto community. The company’s decision to launch a service to unmask wallet owners while simultaneously compromising its own customers’ privacy raises questions about its commitment to user anonymity. This incident serves as a reminder for the crypto industry to prioritize robust privacy measures in order to maintain trust and protect user data.
By
By
By
By
By